Households are facing a “truly dismal” increase in their disposable income following the Budget, the Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) think tank says.

The IFS points to analysis of the government’s tax and spending plans by the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR), which forecast that the average disposable income would grow by “only” 0.5% annually over the next five years.

Disposable income measures the amount of money people have left to spend after taxes have been paid.

IFS director Helen Miller said the growth was disappointing “especially when compared to the more than 2% per year we achieved across every parliament from the mid-1980s to mid-2000s”.

She said this had been another “big Budget”, with “meaningful increases in tax, spending, and borrowing”.

According to the IFS, average disposable income per person is expected to rise by nearly £104 a year for the next four years, under current inflation forecasts.

“Before this Budget, the UK was faced with lacklustre economic growth, stagnating living standards, and a dizzying array of fiscal pressures,” Ms Miller said.

“The same is still true after this Budget.”

Her comments were backed up by the Resolution Foundation think tank, which predicted that the growth in living standards in this parliament would be the second worst on record.

The government has also

Labour’s manifesto last year pledged not to increase “National Insurance, the basic, higher and additional rates of Income Tax, or VAT”.

But in her Budget, Chancellor Rachel Reeves chose to extend the freeze on income tax thresholds for a further three years beyond 2028. She also imposed a £2,000-a-year cap on the amount put into pensions from 2029 through a salary sacrifice arrangement before National Insurance payments are due.

Ms Miller said: “I would call that a breach of the manifesto.”

Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer told the BBC his party made “a number of commitments in our manifesto, which we have kept”, but he accepted he was asking “everybody to make a contribution”, which he said was “fair and necessary”.

“I absolutely wanted to bear down and reduce the cost of living because for most… that will be the single most important thing.”

Reeves also denied the Budget broke manifesto pledges but admitted her policies would have “an impact on working people”.

She told the BBC this contribution had been kept “to a minimum” because of other changes such as increasing taxes on online gambling, properties worth more than £2m and income from dividends or renting out property.

The chancellor also highlighted other measures aimed at cutting the cost of living, including freezing NHS prescription charges and regulated rail fares in England, as well as scrapping green levies added to energy bills.

Asked if she would apologise for breaking her promise not to increase taxes on working people, Reeves said she had made “fair and necessary choices” to cut NHS waiting lists, lift children out of poverty and reduce the cost of living.

In the run-up to the Budget, there was much speculation about the UK’s finances and the outlook for the economy, and how the chancellor faced big gaps in meeting her fiscal rules on borrowing, leading to uncertainty in financial markets.

Giving her analysis of the Budget, Ms Miller noted how the OBR’s “overall forecast downgrade was minimal” and there was “no big fiscal repair job” to do.

In an interview with the BBC, she also said the government appeared to have ignored its stated number one mission to boost economic growth.

“We shouldn’t expect every Budget to solve all of our problems, but I think it’s reasonable to expect that for a government that makes such a big deal of having growth as its number one mission, they would be doing more to drive up growth,” she said.

Ms Miller said Reeves could have reformed the tax system to boost the economy and that the government also has “hard yards” to do in areas such as competition policy, regulation and education.